Gas Detection Mapping

    Process Safety Toolkit

    All calculators

    Gas detection coverage mapping

    Detector layouts are only defensible when the coverage they achieve is quantified. This module builds design-basis spherical gas clouds from the credible release inventory and tests, cloud by cloud, whether the proposed detector layout would see them, producing a geographic coverage score across the monitored area.

    Open the Gas Detection Mapping module

    What this calculator returns

    • Design-basis cloud radius for the selected target gas volume
    • Geographic coverage percentage for the detector layout
    • Uncovered zones highlighted on the plot-plan
    • Effect of adding, moving or removing individual detectors

    Required inputs

    • Plot-plan extents and monitored area boundary
    • Detector coordinates and detection type
    • Design-basis cloud volume or target gas quantity
    • Voting arrangement (1ooN or 2ooN)

    Calculation method

    The design-basis cloud is represented as a sphere of the target flammable volume, positioned on a grid across the monitored area.

    At each grid position the layout is tested against the voting requirement: a cloud is detected when enough detectors fall inside its envelope.

    The fraction of grid positions detected gives the geographic coverage, and the undetected positions are mapped as gaps.

    Governing equations

    r = ( 3 Vcloud / (4 pi) ) ^ (1/3)

    Radius of the equivalent spherical design-basis cloud.

    Coverage = N_detected / N_total

    Geographic coverage as the detected fraction of cloud positions.

    Nomenclature

    Vcloud
    design-basis flammable cloud volume, m3
    r
    equivalent cloud radius, m
    N_detected
    cloud positions satisfying the voting requirement
    N_total
    total cloud positions tested on the grid

    Assumptions and limitations

    • Spherical, homogeneous design-basis clouds rather than CFD-resolved dispersion shapes.
    • Detectors are assumed available and correctly calibrated.
    • Coverage is geographic; scenario-weighted coverage requires release frequency data.

    Reference practice

    • Consistent with the coverage-based approach in ISA TR84.00.07 for fire and gas system effectiveness.

    Worked example

    A design-basis flammable cloud of 15 m3 screened against point detectors in a congested module.

    StepValueBasis
    Cloud volume15 m3Set from the release and congestion basis for the area
    Equivalent radius1.53 mr = (3V / 4 pi)^(1/3) for the spherical design cloud
    Coverage testDetector inside the cloud envelopeA grid of cloud centres is swept over the module footprint
    Voting1ooN or 2ooN2ooN coverage needs two detectors inside the same cloud, which drives detector count sharply up

    A design cloud only 1.5 m in radius means detector spacing, not detector sensitivity, controls coverage; small clouds and 2ooN voting are what force dense layouts.

    Illustrative numbers only — rerun the module with the project basis of design before using any result.

    Common questions

    What is geographic coverage?

    The fraction of grid positions where a design-basis cloud placed at that position would be detected by the required number of detectors.

    What coverage target is common?

    Around 90 percent geographic coverage for 1ooN detection is a widely used goal, with a lower target where 2ooN voting is required.

    Do line-of-sight detectors change the assessment?

    Yes. Open-path detectors are assessed on beam intersection with the cloud and path-averaged concentration, not on a single point location.

    Related calculators

    Results are engineering estimates and must be reviewed against the project basis of design by a competent engineer before use in a safety study.

    13 calculation modules are available in the full toolkit index, and the background theory is covered in the process safety resources.