Gas Dispersion

    Process Safety Toolkit

    All calculators

    Atmospheric gas dispersion calculator

    Once a release rate is known, dispersion determines how far a flammable or toxic cloud travels before it dilutes below a concentration of concern. This module evaluates downwind concentrations for continuous releases using Gaussian plume theory with Pasquill-Gifford dispersion coefficients, and reports concentrations at user-placed receptor points.

    Open the Gas Dispersion module

    What this calculator returns

    • Downwind centreline concentration profile
    • Concentration at nominated receptor coordinates
    • Distance to lower flammable limit or a toxic endpoint
    • Cloud footprint for plotting on a plot-plan

    Required inputs

    • Release rate and release height
    • Wind speed at reference height and atmospheric stability class
    • Surface roughness or terrain category
    • Concentration of concern (LFL fraction, ERPG, or user value)

    Calculation method

    A continuous point-source Gaussian plume is evaluated with stability-dependent dispersion coefficients for the lateral and vertical spread.

    Ground reflection is included by an image source, so near-ground receptors capture the doubled contribution.

    The concentration field is scanned to find the distance at which the concentration of concern is crossed on the plume centreline.

    Governing equations

    C(x,y,z) = ( m / (2 pi u sy sz) ) exp( -y^2 / (2 sy^2) ) [ exp( -(z-H)^2 / (2 sz^2) ) + exp( -(z+H)^2 / (2 sz^2) ) ]

    Gaussian plume concentration with ground reflection.

    C_centreline(x) = m / ( pi u sy sz )

    Ground-level centreline concentration for a ground-level release.

    Nomenclature

    C
    concentration, kg/m3
    m
    continuous mass release rate, kg/s
    u
    wind speed at release height, m/s
    sy, sz
    lateral and vertical dispersion coefficients, m
    H
    effective release height, m
    x, y, z
    downwind, crosswind and vertical coordinates, m

    Assumptions and limitations

    • Steady wind speed and direction over the averaging period.
    • Flat, unobstructed terrain; buildings and congestion are not resolved.
    • Neutrally buoyant behaviour unless the dense-gas option is selected.

    Reference practice

    • Follows the Pasquill-Gifford framework described in the CCPS consequence analysis guidelines.

    Worked example

    A 0.1 kg/s ground-level methane release, wind speed 5 m/s, with dispersion coefficients sigma_y = 30 m and sigma_z = 15 m at the receptor distance.

    StepValueBasis
    Plume spreadsigma_y = 30 m, sigma_z = 15 mSet by the Pasquill stability class and downwind distance
    Centreline concentration1.4e-5 kg/m3C = Q / (pi u sigma_y sigma_z) for a ground-level source and receptor
    Volume fractionabout 21 ppmConverted with the gas density of 0.68 kg/m3
    ComparisonWell below the 5 vol% LFLThe flammable cloud therefore ends much closer to the source than this receptor

    Concentration falls roughly with the product of the two spread parameters, so stable night-time conditions with small sigma values give the longest hazard distances for the same release rate.

    Illustrative numbers only — rerun the module with the project basis of design before using any result.

    Common questions

    Which weather case gives the worst dispersion distance?

    Stable, low-wind conditions such as Pasquill F with 2 m/s. Spread is small, so the cloud stays concentrated much further downwind.

    When is a Gaussian model not appropriate?

    For dense or cold vapours that slump and spread laterally near the ground; those need a dense-gas treatment rather than a passive Gaussian plume.

    What release rate should be used?

    The source term from the gas discharge or blowdown module, at the moment in the release history being assessed.

    Related calculators

    Results are engineering estimates and must be reviewed against the project basis of design by a competent engineer before use in a safety study.

    13 calculation modules are available in the full toolkit index, and the background theory is covered in the process safety resources.